KATHRYN FULTON, BS
Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Class of 2026
SUMMARY POINTS
Early efforts in opioid withdrawal treatment focused on managing symptoms.
Buprenorphine and methadone induction is now the standard of care for withdrawal treatment and a critical linkage point to long-term treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD).
Buprenorphine is commonly used in Emergency Departments (EDs), but regimens have changed with increasing fentanyl use and incidence of precipitated withdrawal.
An evolving illicit drug market, federal regulations, and patient and physician concerns are barriers to effective, accessible withdrawal treatments.
Innovations in treatment are critical to expand access to OUD treatment and reduce all-cause mortality.
ANALYSIS
Background
Opioid-related hospitalizations have increased in the last decade with 5-10% of hospitalized patients having opioid use disorder (OUD). In a recent study of opioid-related presentations in Philadelphia Emergency Departments (EDs), 70% were for opioid withdrawal (1). Uncontrolled withdrawal contributes to high rates of patient-directed discharge and all-cause mortality (2).
Opioid withdrawal consists of acute physiologic and psychiatric symptoms which can be caused by abstinence of opioids following chronic use or precipitated after administering an opioid antagonist or partial agonist (3,4). Symptoms include sympathetic hyperactivity (agitation, cravings, etc), influenza-like symptoms, and gastrointestinal discomfort. The Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Scale (COWS) is an objective scale used to grade symptom severity and guide treatment (5,6). The onset of withdrawal symptoms depends on the drug used and timing of last use, spanning 12 hours for short-acting opioids (i.e. heroin) to 24-72 hours for long-acting opioids (i.e. fentanyl).
This analysis will discuss the primary medications considered for opioid withdrawal treatment and how recommendations have changed to optimize patient care and adapt to increasing opioid-related hospitalizations, changing regulations on medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD), and an evolving illicit drug market.
History of Opioid Withdrawal Treatments
Long-acting opioid agonists and α2-adrenergic agonists have been widely used over the years for opioid withdrawal treatment. Methadone is a full opioid agonist. Buprenorphine is a partial opioid agonist with high affinity, allowing it to displace opioids bound, and low intrinsic activity, creating a “ceiling effect” on sedation and respiratory depression (7–9). Buprenorphine is often formulated with naloxone, which is inert when ingested and prevents injection diversion (6,10). α2-Adrenergic agonists like clonidine and lofexidine suppress norepinephrine release to treat withdrawal, but clonidine is not FDA-approved and has significant side effects like hypotension (4,11).
Clonidine was one of the earliest agents used off-label for opioid withdrawal treatment in the 1980s (11). Then, treatment of withdrawal in EDs primarily focused on symptomatic relief. Opioid agonists were limited to inpatient and outpatient programs. In 2000, Congress passed the Drug Addiction Treatment Act (DATA 2000), allowing buprenorphine and methadone to be prescribed for opioid withdrawal treatment in non-outpatient settings for up to 72 hours. ED physicians were uniquely positioned to address acute withdrawal and offer linkage to long-term MOUD (7,12,13). Multiple studies have since proven buprenorphine effective across healthcare settings and superior to clonidine for treatment retention and reducing withdrawal symptoms (14, 15). Buprenorphine is also safer and easier to administer than methadone, making it ideal for use in EDs (3,15,16).
Current Regimens: Buprenorphine
The current standard of care for withdrawal treatment is buprenorphine or methadone with psychosocial support and nonopioid adjunctive medications (3, 4, 5). There is increasing evidence that ED buprenorphine use is safe, cost-effective, and a critical entry point to long-term MOUD care (15,17). Despite wide support for the standard buprenorphine induction regimen, guidance on dosing and timing is evolving and subject to limitations (3,5,7,18,19).
Time is one limitation as unduction is a multi-day process. Inadequate dose escalations can result in patient discomfort and early treatment cessation. Studies, however, indicate a high-dose induction pathway reaches a therapeutic dose within hours, extends the duration of buprenorphine, and is safe and effective in ED settings (1,9,12,19).
Another limitation is precipitated withdrawal. Patients must be in moderate to severe withdrawal and abstain from opioids before buprenorphine induction to avoid buprenorphine precipitated withdrawal (BPOW) (4,8,11). This occurs when buprenorphine displaces remaining opioids from receptors and causes rapid, severe withdrawal symptoms which can prompt patient-directed discharge (1). Although uncommon, BPOW is extremely uncomfortable and a growing concern among physicians and patients, particularly fentanyl users (21,22). Fentanyl takes longer to “wash out” than other opioids and has an increased risk of BPOW. As a result, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Service Administration (SAMHSA) recently altered its recommendations to initiate buprenorphine later at a higher COWS score (9,10,22). Also, low-dose or microdose inductions have been used to prevent BPOW by using initial doses too low to precipitate withdrawal. As buprenorphine is titrated up, the patient can continue using opioids (illicit or prescribed), effectively avoiding withdrawal (3,23). Both high and low dose induction methods are safe alternatives to prevent BPOW, however, further research and alternatives are needed (1,9,22,24).
Current Regimens: Methadone
Methadone is the only other FDA-approved medication with similar efficacy to buprenorphine, but it remains underutilized. Current methadone prescribing in EDs is largely for individuals already taking methadone. However, multiple studies have demonstrated successful same-day methadone induction for withdrawal management in bridge clinics and EDs with rapid referral to outpatient care and high treatment retention (1,9,12). Regulation of methadone continues to be the primary barrier to expansion into EDs. DATA 2000 continues to be underutilized and methadone administration is restricted to licensed sites with limited hours and waiting lists (8,9). Further, methadone induction requires ED infrastructure to connect patients to outpatient treatment (12,13). Although methadone has more regulatory barriers, side effects, and drug interactions than buprenorphine, it has several advantages. It can be started without prolonged abstinence and there is no risk of precipitated withdrawal (3,9). More research and legislative efforts are needed to expand access to methadone and increase collaboration between EDs and outpatient treatment centers.
General Barriers & Limitations
Despite advancements in opioid withdrawal regimens, barriers to expansion of treatment exist. Stigma about “replacing one opioid with another” remains a concern of patients and clinicians, emphasizing the need for evidence-based MOUD training (7,21). Withdrawal patients have also expressed concerns about undertreated psychiatric symptoms and the severity of symptoms upon discontinuing MOUD (7,21). This highlights the importance of ancillary medication and counseling on the short and long-term effects of MOUD. Moreover, physicians are concerned about undertreating pain. However, updated American Society of Addiction Medicine guidelines indicate providers can safely manage pain by using higher buprenorphine or methadone doses and opioid pain medications as needed (25). Lastly, a lack of competent, confident clinicians adversely impacts effective withdrawal management. In recent studies, however, resident educational interventions have resulted in increased knowledge and confidence treating opioid withdrawal (26,27).
Innovations in Opioid Withdrawal Treatment
In the fentanyl era, methadone and buprenorphine do not provide adequate relief for all patients experiencing opioid withdrawal. Changes in the dosing and timing of buprenorphine regimens have been promising. Extended-release buprenorphine injections are also being evaluated in clinical trials as an alternative induction method allowing earlier, shorter treatment (20). Recent studies show short-acting opioids as a complement to MOUD can provide immediate relief of withdrawal symptoms and address severe pain. However, further studies are needed to evaluate usage when pain is not present (2).
Additionally, the illicit drug market has seen the emergence of Xylazine, which is often mixed with fentanyl or heroin, necessitating further studies regarding its impact on withdrawal. Recent case studies have supported coupling α2-adrenergic agonists with buprenorphine micro-induction for dual management of Xylazine and opioid withdrawal (28,29).
Lastly, it is important to acknowledge studies evaluating withdrawal treatments have largely focused on symptom relief and MOUD treatment retention. Future research should evaluate desired patient outcomes. One study suggests α2 agonists might be more appropriate for managing withdrawal to decrease opioid dose whereas opioid agonists might be preferable for opioid discontinuation (11).
Discussion
Untreated opioid withdrawal is associated with premature patient-directed discharge and higher all-cause mortality. This is a missed opportunity in OUD care (8,18). Opioid agonists like methadone and buprenorphine are life-saving medications used for withdrawal management, but these regimens are not the only solution and require continued evaluation (8).
Opioid withdrawal treatment alone is insufficient to treat OUD. Effective OUD treatment requires transitioning the patient to long-term treatment with MOUD. The proper identification and treatment of withdrawal, however, is a critical opportunity to engage patients regarding transition (8,3,4,9).
As the illicit drug market, OUD patient treatment goals, and federal regulations continue to change, innovations in opioid treatment regimens are critical to expand access to care and reduce all-cause mortality. Clinicians and healthcare institutions should prioritize treatment of opioid withdrawal and establish the infrastructure to facilitate entry into long-term treatment. This is the truly life-saving impact of MOUD.
References
10. Herring A. Medication-Assisted Treatment of Opioid Addiction. 2016 Aug 1 [cited 2023 Jun 27]; Available from: chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.chcf.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/PDF-EDMATOpioidProtocols.pdf
Comentarios